Street Railway Strike (Part 5) - 1892
At
precisely 12 o’clock, noon, on Thursday September 8, 1892, through the
influence of Mr. George E. Tuckett, one of the directors of the Hamilton Street
Railway Company, a conference was held at the company’s main office. Those
present for the meeting included the directors of the company and a deputation
from the discharged employees. The meeting, which lasted over half an hour,
ended unsatisfactorily for the discharged employees.
The new time-table was gone over in
some detail and was pronounced by both sides as being as equitable as it
practically could be. With regard to the employees’ association, the discharged
men denied emphatically that there was any purpose to the organization other
than for mutual assistance in case of sickness. The men did admit that those
who joined the association were obliged to agree to stand by one another in
case of trouble.
Mr. Tuckett suggested that the men who
organized the association should have been consulted the directors of the
company beforehand:
“ ‘Would Mr. Charlton attend a meeting
of the association?’ Mr. Sharpe asked.
“ ‘If I had been invited to attend the
meeting for organizing this association, I would have been pleased to do so,’
said Mr. Charlton, ‘and I have no doubt that Mr. Griffin would have attended
also; but, in view of the events which have been caused by this association, I
would not have attended a meeting now, and am certain that Mr. Griffith would
not either.’
“ ‘Mr. O’Heir asked whether the men
who had been discharged would be reinstated.
“ ‘No,,’ Mr. Charlton replied, ‘not
the men who have been discharged. There are only five or six of them. These men
we have reason to know have been active in organizing opposition to the
company, and we don’t want that class of men in our service.’
“ ‘Will the men who left their cars
yesterday be reinstated?’
“ Mr. Charlton said that those men who
were known to have been ringleaders in this movement would not be taken back in
any event. As for the others he would not say.
“Mr. Martin thought the conduct of
those men who left their cars yesterday without consideration for the public
traffic and the interest of the company was most reprehensible.
“It was declared by all the employees
present that this movement on the part of the men was not authorized, and was
the outcome of a sudden impulse of sympathy and indignation when it was learned
that those who had been sent to confer with the company’s officers were discharged
without a hearing.
“ ‘ We will tie up all our cars, and
keep them tied up, rather than submit to dictation from our men as to how we
should manage our business,’ said Mr. Charlton.”1
1
“A
New Time-Table in Force : Easier for the Motormen and Conductors”
Hamilton Spectator. September 8, 1892.
After 3 p.m., Thursday, September 8, 1892,
the deputation of Alderman A. D. Stewart and Rev. Dr. Burns went to the Street
Railway Company’s offices to discuss the situation. President Charlton and
Manager Griffith received the men appointed at the Gore Park mass meeting to
represent the employees’ position.
Rev. Dr. Burns began by stating that he felt
that there had been a serious misunderstanding between the company and the men.
He felt that fifteen hour working days were far too much for the men, and he
could not understand why it was necessary for the men to have to work fifteen
hours a day for two days and four hours the third day. Alderman Stewart felt the
men’s schedules should be equalized. He also stated that there was a serious
misunderstanding over the nature of the employees’ association. The employees
denied that they had organized for the purpose of striking and requested that
the discharged men be reinstated :
“ ‘Neither of us,’ Alderman Stewart said,
‘came here to ask you to recede from a position you take if it is the right
one, and we don’t want you to eat humble pie”2
2 The Street Car Difficulty : A
Satisfactory Settlement Arranged For” Hamilton Spectator. September 9, 1892.
President Charlton explained that the new
schedule which, had just been drawn up, would go a long way to satisfy the men’s
demands :
“It gave them the proper time off for meals.
They had been considering the new schedule for some time, and some of the men,
at least, were aware of this. He understood that the matter was referred to at
the men’s meeting on Monday, so that the men could not say they acted in
ignorance of the company’s action.”2
2 “Strikers May Go Back : The Street Car
Troubles Nearing an End Now” Hamilton Herald .September 9, 1892.
As for the issue of reinstating the
discharged employees, President Charlton absolutely refused to reconsider the
company’s position. President Charlton
also would not countenance the existence of an employees’ association:
“The continuation of such an organization is
not necessary. If the men want sick benefits, there are so many channels
outside open for them to join and receive all the benefits they want. We cannot
help viewing the organization as an undesirable thing – a menace to our
interests. It can be made use of by designing people to do much harm to both
the men and ourselves. Had I known of the proposition to start an organization,
I would have advised against it. We want to have perfect confidence in the men.
We Cannot, and will not, allow the men to share in the management.
“I understand one of the objects of the
organization is to insist on our reasons for dismissing the men being made
known. We will not do this. It must be one man for one job. A conductor must be
a conductor and a motorman a motorman, but they must not take a hand with the
management. We will not countenance
organization among the men.”2
President Charlton was firm in stating that
the ringleaders of the organization would not be reinstated, but that the other
men who had left their cars could be taken back if they made representations to
the company on an individual basis.
Alderman Stewart and Rev. Dr. Burns promised
to report back to the men, but stated to President Charlton that they found the
conference to be most unsatisfactory.
Comments
Post a Comment